Help enforce SC decision on Japekrom-Drobo land dispute – Japekrom Omanhene to Akufo-Addo

2
2613
Okatakyie-Amoa-Aturu-Nkonkonkyia II Omanhene of Japekrom sitting Majestically at the Jubilee House.

The Omanhene and president of the Japekrom Traditional Council, Okatakyie Amoa Aturu Nkonkonkyia II, has made a passionate appeal to President Akufo-Addo to assist the Japekrom Traditional Council in its quest to implement a Supreme Court decision on a land dispute between his people and those of the Drobo Traditional Area.

Click on the play button to play a sound:


Addressing President Akufo-Addo at Jubilee House in Accra today , when he paid a courtesy call on him, Okatakyie Amoa Aturu Nkonkonkyia II noted that the Drobohene had taken the Japekrom Traditional Council to court on behalf of the Drobo Stool some time in , laying claim to all the stool lands of the Mpuasu-Japekrom Traditional Area, including the stool lands of the Awasu Traditional Area and Atuna Divisional Area.

The case, the Omanhene said, had “travelled from the high court through to the Supreme Court. The Drobo Stool lost all the cases from high dourt to the Supreme Court, with the Supreme Court on 19 November 2015 dismissing the appeal of the Drobo Stool and affirming the orders of the Court of Appeal that sat in Kumasi on

The-elders-and-chiefs-and-the-Omanhene-of-the-Japekrom-Traditional-Area-Okatakyie-Amoa-Aturu-Nkonkonkyia-II
The-elders-and-chiefs-and-the-Omanhene-of-the-Japekrom-Traditional-Area-Okatakyie-Amoa-Aturu-Nkonkonkyia-II

Supreme Court decision

The Supreme Court, affirming the orders of the Court of Appeal, ordered that the Drobo stool should acknowledge ownership and title of the lands to the Japekrom stool.

It also ordered that the Drobohene and his subjects now in possession of the Mpuasu-Japekrom stool lands should seek the grant of their respective lands from the Mpuasu-Japekrom stool.

“These were the orders and we fully stand by,” the Omanhene of Japekrom said. “The story being [peddled in] various corners that Japekromhene insists on ejecting the people of Drobo from their stool land is nothing but a fallacy.

“I have not made such a demand anywhere, publicly or privately.

“The Drobohene, his elders and subjects have vehemently refused to adhere to the court orders, leading to the disturbance of peace in the area. This is the source of the insecurity in the area, resulting in the massacre of

“We wish to bring to the attention of the president that there has never been a chieftaincy dispute between Japekrom and Drobo, as the two are separate traditional areas. The land litigation has also been settled by the judgment of the Supreme Court of .

“The issue at stake, therefore, is solely on the implementation of the court’s orders and in this we seek the president’s assistance to ensure a lasting peace for the area,” the Omanhene said.

The-elders-and-chiefs-and-the-Omanhene-of-the-Japekrom-Traditional-Area-Okatakyie-Amoa-Aturu-Nkonkonkyia-II
The-elders-and-chiefs-and-the-Omanhene-of-the-Japekrom-Traditional-Area-Okatakyie-Amoa-Aturu-Nkonkonkyia-II

President’s response

President Akufo-Addo, responding to the request from the chiefs and elders of the Japekrom Traditional Area, said he was pleased with the reconciliatory tone of the submission by the Japekrom Omanhene and by the quest to achieve lasting peace in that part of the Bono Region.

He added that, to the extent that the Supreme Court has delivered a decision on the land dispute, finality has been brought to the matter. To this end, the implementation of the decision should not be a problem at all, he said.

The president pledged that his government will give the Omanhene’s request adequate attention so that the matter can be settled.

Content was party sourced from Wilberforce Asare – Asaase Radio

2 COMMENTS

  1. Many thanks Osei Kwame for the comment.
    Japekrom has faced many injustices and neglected for far too long to the extent that even the name Japekrom was deliberately removed from many official documents including the Electoral Register – this is simply diabolical. The name Japekrom was always problematic for the drobo people because it always raises for them the question of ownership and boundary. The drobo people thought that by removing the name Japekrom from official documents it would create the impression that the name Japekrom has somehow been changed to ‘Drobo’. For years they waged a campaign to spread falsehood about Japekrom and discredit the men and women who were trying to expose their nefarious ways. The shooting and killing of 3 people on October 17th, 2018 was meant to intimidate and cause fear, but our will is strong and our spirits remain unbroken – they underestimated our resolve and determination to regain our name, status and exert influence on our land.

    It is a good thing that Nana Amoa Aturu Nkonkonkyia II is a man of peace and has always insisted on using legal means to seek justice – this process may seem slow, and even frustrating at times but we the of Japekrom understand it and feel confident in the fact that we will be victorious in the end.
    This does not mean we have forgotten ABOUT WHAT THEY HAVE DONE TO OUR PEOPLE. It may seem they have got away with such heinous crime but the law will eventually catch up with them.

    Drobo in the Jaman South is a figment of the imagination, it was founded upon lies, deceit and misuse of government authority and as the truth about Japekrom gradually emerges the name Drobo will fade into insignificance just like shea butter melts in sunlight.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.